Here is an announcement for a workshop that asks some new and interesting questions about the status of ‘biosociety futurology’. The “Futures of Life” workshop is organized by the graduate students and faculty of the Department of S&TS at Cornell University and will take place April 27-29, 2007.

Read More

(originally published 11 October; updated 20 Oct because of new comments): 

Today’s (i.e., 11 October) big public health news report is the article by a Johns Hopkins University research team published in The Lancet on-line edition on the number of war-related casualties in Iraq. “We estimate”, the authors conclude, “that as of July, 2006, there have been 654 965 (392 979–942 636) excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war, which corresponds to 2,5% of the population in the study area”.

As Lancet’s editor, Richard Horton, points out in a comment, “this study adds substantially to the new field of conflict epidemiology, which has been evolving rapidly in recent years”. Unsurprisingly, US President George W. Bush questions the findings: “I don’t consider it a credible report”, he told a White House press conference (according to today’s Guardian ).

The Lancet’s report underscores the importance of the complex relations between war and (lack of) health throughout history.

Read More

The following report of the annual meeting of the German Society for the History of Medicine, Science and Technology (Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft und Technik, DGGMNT) and the Society for History of Science (Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, GWG) held in Braunschweig, 28 September -1 Oktober 2006 shows that the cultural history of science is flourishing in the German speaking part of Europe:
Read More

Adam, here’s something for you: 

Conference on “Body and Textuality. Telling Bodies: Practices, Discourses, Looks”, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, 26-30 March, 2007

The body in the 21st century is everything but a certainty, a condition which raises an infinite number of questions. This Conference intends thus to be an interdisciplinary meeting point for discussing the body as a central cultural construction.
 

See further: http://www.h-net.org/announce/show.cgi?ID=152947

The journal EMBO Reports has a good review article (“Seeing is understanding: Improvements in computer software and hardware are revolutionizing three-dimensional imaging in biology”, Embo Reports, vol. 7, pp. 467-70) of the state-of-the-art of 3D-imaging in biomedical science — read it here. They refer, among other developments in the field, to a ribosome animation movie made by Said Sannuga, a molecular biologist and animation specialist, in cooperation with Venki Ramakrishnan at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge. Here’s a still from their movie:

The movie version will hopefully soon be available online.

Here’s another workshop that deals with one of the central issues for museums that try to make sense of recent biomedicine and biotechnology, viz. how humanness (“Menschsein”) is treated narratively in biomedicine and other cultural domains, like literature. Read More

If you happen to have your way through Toronto in the autumn and spring, why not visit The Women and Gender Studies Institute at the University of Toronto to attend its “Biopolitics + Technoscience” meeting series.

This series is an interdisciplinary exploration of how life-itself is transformed through technology, science, and governance in a transnational world.   Its premise is that “biopolitics”   — loosely defined as the governing of life  — is a productive starting point to theorize the multiple and conflicting ways technoscience has altered living-being in forms as varied as sex, race, genomes, biodiversity, national populations and labor. The series is composed of fall roundtables and spring public lectures.

Read More

Steve Woolgar and Bruno Latour started their careers with the book Laboratory Life (1979). A child of the linguistic turn in the humanities — one of their theses was the laboratories are about inscriptions; a site were lab people constantly write and inscribe –it became one of the most cited books in the science studies literature. What they missed, and what much of science studies has missed, is that laboratories are sites of play and fun; not so much playing with math and bacteria, but playing with lab mates. Which this short (3’44”) video clip from one of the lab teams (the happy nerds in team #62) at the Sanger Institute shows.

PS: they also have their spare-time drag show …

Now we’re up and running again. Nick has upgraded us to WordPress 2.0.4 and introduced a new and better spam filter. For better or for worse, this means that there are no more viagra or phentermine pills, mature babes, cheap boys or online poker games on sale in the comment section any more. Our in-house users/writers will also see a new screen interface which may take a few minutes to get accustomed to. Unfortunately the upgrade has removed our nifty icon (the gene chip-in-a-jar), but all this — and some better features — will be introduced stepwise in the next couple of weeks. Until then, continue to enjoy!

Th

Kulturnatten mindede mig om en gammel diskussion vi har haft igennem årenes løb — nemmelig, hvorvidt vi skal modernisere eller lade være. Måske er det sådan, at mange af vores besøgende kan lide stedet netop fordi det ikke er 100% tip-top istandsat og professionelt. Dvs. at de vender tilbage kulturnat efter kulturnat fordi huset bærer præg af forfald, spontaneitet og en god portion amatørisme hist og her.

Det kan man jo — hvis det er rigtigt — ærge sig over som gammel professionel perfektionist. Men samtidigt skal man nok ikke glemme, at forfaldet og det dilettantiske har en æstetik — og en attraktionskraft. For nogle uger siden påpegede turistorganisationen Wonderful Copenhagen i Berlingske Tidende at normaliseringen af Christiania vil medføre et tab for turistnæringen i København. Jo mere pænt og tilrettelagt Christiania bliver, jo mere mister Christiania sin autenticitet og tiltrækningskraft. Gælder detsamme Medicinsk Museion?